January 24, 2017
LATEST

Leave a Reply

12 Comments on "Proposed code amendment would limit part of Brookhaven’s Overlay District density to 30 units per acre"

Notify of
avatar
3000
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Tom Reilly
Guest

Sounds like a viable option for Brookhaven’s past, present, and future.

Josh
Guest

What’s the hold up on the Overlay re-write process? The moratorium expires Feb. 19th, 2017. I trust we can select an appropriate consultant to hire without waiting on the dinosaurs with the BPCA to give their blessing. The Overlay re-write is what we need to then move on to the zoning re-write. No more band-aids. Let’s get the real work done.

Nate
Guest

How can the city staff recommend approving Dresden Village at 47 units/acre while proposing an ammendment to limit future development to 30 units/acres. That makes no sense…what gives?

Betty
Guest

I hope I’m wrong but this reads as let’s us approve Connolly and we will give you this amendment to make you feel like we are listening but don’t forget if the right developer ask for 120 units per acre we can approve a variance.

Pay Boone
Guest

Way to sum it right on up Betty. This is exactly what they are doing. Exactly. Do they really think we are alll just stupid? Or is this just another way to run our faces in it?

Eric Robert
Guest
It looks like they are putting part of the MARTA property into this 30 per acre density. Is this to accommodate a transition? Alternatively, why would you allow higher density all the way up Ashford Dunwoody past Town Brookhaven than on the MARTA Lot? The MARTA Lot should be the highest density and density should drop as you get further away from the station (where transit usage percentages also drop). This looks like Gwinnett Style zoning with high density strips along busy roads. Density configuration should be more circular with density being reduced from the center. Stretching Density along a… Read more »
Barbara
Guest

The Marta lot should be sold and adhere to same rules as the rest of us

Eric Robert
Guest

they are adhering to the same rules.

Barbara
Guest

Then why are they applying for variance?

Eric Robert
Guest
Because the rules say they can apply for one. And based on the merits of the application Brookhaven can approve or deny the Variance as they can with the re-zoning request. But Variances and Rezoning requests are often given. That’s the whole point of having rezoning and variance process. Though I can see how some may want a Sams Club, an Arby’s or Burger King or Bojangles or other retail would be better here. Retail generates more car trips but the density would be lower Maybe we could get the McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts and Waffle House to move to the… Read more »
???
Guest

As you point out, relying on density can be misleading. Development with sixty one bedroom apartments on an acre is 60/acre. Build the exact same building form but configure two bedroom apartments and you have 30 units/acre (or there about) Same number of cars, two bedroom probably 2 cars, 1 bedroom 1 car.

Barbara
Guest
Thanks for making my point. Instead of getting business on privately owned land to move why dont we just forget this whole MARTA TOD mess? No one is on board with that development, no one except you. I understand you are a MARTA user, which is great,but that isn’t going to change with this new disaster and neither is ridership. You will still use it, no one else in Brookhaven will. It goes no where. I dont need to see the Hard Rock Cafe or East Point. I can drive there is 1/10 of the time if I want to… Read more »
wpDiscuz